↓ Skip to main content

GC-MS identification of gaseous volatiles in wastewater

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, July 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
GC-MS identification of gaseous volatiles in wastewater
Published in
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, July 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf00454745
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lawrence C. C. Koe, N. C. Tan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Environmental Science 2 25%
Chemical Engineering 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Design 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2007.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#555
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,586
of 15,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.