You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Organochlorine chemical residues in bluegills and common carp from the irrigated San Joaquin Valley Floor, California
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, July 1986
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01066402 |
| Authors |
Michael K. Saiki, Christopher J. Schmitt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 33% |
| Researcher | 2 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 4 | 67% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,968,506
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#245
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,274
of 10,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.