↓ Skip to main content

Do We Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Political Science, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
213 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do We Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change?
Published in
British Journal of Political Science, June 2011
DOI 10.1017/s0007123411000147
Authors

Stephen Bell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 292 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 35%
Student > Master 45 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Lecturer 17 6%
Researcher 13 4%
Other 65 21%
Unknown 32 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 191 63%
Business, Management and Accounting 23 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 5%
Environmental Science 12 4%
Unspecified 6 2%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 37 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2013.
All research outputs
#14,174,202
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Political Science
#906
of 1,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,574
of 112,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Political Science
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.