| Title |
Field study of the emissions of methyl chloride and other halocarbons from biomass burning in Western Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, October 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00708182 |
| Authors |
J. Rudolph, A. Khedim, R. Koppmann, B. Bonsang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 26% |
| Researcher | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 9 | 39% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,522,518
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry
#6
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,530
of 24,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.