Francesco Del Galdo, Alain Lescoat, Philip G. Conaghan, Eugenia Bertoldo, Jelena Čolić, Tânia Santiago, Yossra A. Suliman, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Armando Gabrielli, Oliver Distler, Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold, Ivan Castellví, Alexandra Balbir-Gurman, Madelon Vonk, Lidia Ananyeva, Simona Rednic, Anna Tarasova, Pedrag Ostojic, Vladimira Boyadzhieva, Khadija El Aoufy, Sue Farrington, Ilaria Galetti, Christopher P. Denton, Otylia Kowal-Bielecka, Ulf Mueller-Ladner, Yannick Allanore, Philip G Conaghan, Yossra A Suliman, Christopher P Denton
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)
18
13%
Scientists
9
7%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 168. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2026.
All research outputs
#306,550
of 34,675,053 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#115
of 10,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,751
of 414,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#1
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,675,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
