↓ Skip to main content

CD62L as a Therapeutic Target in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CD62L as a Therapeutic Target in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-1037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melinda Burgess, Devinder Gill, Richa Singhania, Catherine Cheung, Lynne Chambers, Brent A. Renyolds, Louise Smith, Peter Mollee, Nicholas Saunders, Nigel AJ McMillan

Abstract

Despite advances in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the disease remains incurable with standard therapies and relapse is inevitable. A growing body of evidence indicates that alterations in the adhesion properties of neoplastic cells play a pivotal role in the development and progression of CLL.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,457,954
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#6,017
of 12,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,765
of 211,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#93
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.