↓ Skip to main content

C3 glomerulopathy and eculizumab: a report on four paediatric cases

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
C3 glomerulopathy and eculizumab: a report on four paediatric cases
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00467-017-3619-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Célia Lebreton, Justine Bacchetta, Frédérique Dijoud, Lucie Bessenay, Véronique Fremeaux-Bacchi, Anne Laure Sellier-Leclerc

Abstract

Eculizumab may be used to treat C3-glomerulopathy (C3G), a rare but severe glomerular disease. Patients 1, 2 and 3 were diagnosed with nephritic syndrome with alternative complement pathway activation (low C3, C3Nef-positive) and C3G at the age of 9, 13 and 12 years, respectively. Treatment with eculizumab normalized proteinuria within 1, 2 and 7 months, respectively. Proteinuria relapsed when eculizumab was withdrawn, but the re-introduction of eculizumab normalized proteinuria. Patient 4 was diagnosed with C3G at 9 years of age, with progression to end-stage renal disease within 2 years, followed by a first renal transplantation (R-Tx) with early disease recurrence and graft loss within 39 months. After a second R-Tx, she rapidly presented with biological and histological recurrence: therapy with eculizumab was started, with no effect on proteinuria after 5 months, in a complex clinical setting (i.e. association of C3G recurrence, humoral rejection and BK nephritis). Eculizumab was withdrawn due to multiple viral reactivations, but the re-introduction of the drug a few months later enabled a moderate decrease in proteinuria. These cases illustrate the efficacy of eculizumab, at least on native kidneys, in paediatric C3G. However, larger international studies are warranted to confirm the benefit and safety of eculizumab therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 52%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#15,448,846
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#2,757
of 3,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,084
of 311,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#68
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,571 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.