↓ Skip to main content

Effects of plant density on the photosynthetic and chloroplast characteristics of maize under high-yielding conditions

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Effects of plant density on the photosynthetic and chloroplast characteristics of maize under high-yielding conditions
Published in
The Science of Nature, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00114-017-1445-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baizhao Ren, Wei Liu, Jiwang Zhang, Shuting Dong, Peng Liu, Bin Zhao

Abstract

Plant density has been recognized as a major factor determining the grain yield. The photosynthetic performance changes as the density increases. The main objective of this research was to evaluate responses of photosynthetic performance and chloroplast ultrastructure to planting densities in two summer maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids Denghai661 (DH661) and Nongda108 (ND108). DH661 was planted at densities of 30,000, 45,000, 60,000, 75,000, 90,000, 105,000, 120,000, or 135,000 plants ha(-1). ND108 was planted at densities of 30,000, 45,000, 60,000, 75,000, or 90,000 plants ha(-1). Research variables included leaf area, grain yield, chlorophyll content, leaf gas exchange parameters, number of chloroplasts, and chloroplast ultrastructure. As plant density increased, chlorophyll a and b content significantly decreased; carotenoids initially decreased and then increased; the net photosynthetic rate during each growth period significantly decreased; the membrane structure of mesophyll cells was gradually damaged; the number of chloroplasts significantly decreased; the external form of chloroplasts shifted from long and oval to elliptical or circular; the number of grana significantly decreased, while the number of grana lamellae increased; grana gradually became hypogenetic and eventually dissolved; plot yield increased; and yield per plant significantly decreased. The yield per plant of DH661 at 135,000 plants ha(-1) and that of ND108 at 90,000 plants ha(-1) decreased by 65.8 and 42.5%, respectively, compared with those at 30,000 plants ha(-1).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Researcher 3 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 44%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Philosophy 1 4%
Unknown 13 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2017.
All research outputs
#21,141,111
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#2,076
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,768
of 312,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#22
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.