↓ Skip to main content

Opiate addiction and overdose: experiences, attitudes, and appetite for community naloxone provision

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Opiate addiction and overdose: experiences, attitudes, and appetite for community naloxone provision
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, February 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgp17x689857
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomás Barry, Jan Klimas, Helen Tobin, Mairead Egan, Gerard Bury

Abstract

More than 200 opiate overdose deaths occur annually in Ireland. Overdose prevention and management, including naloxone prescription, should be a priority for healthcare services. Naloxone is an effective overdose treatment and is now being considered for wider lay use. To establish GPs' views and experiences of opiate addiction, overdose care, and naloxone provision. An anonymous postal survey to GPs affiliated with the Department of Academic General Practice, University College Dublin, Ireland. A total of 714 GPs were invited to complete an anonymous postal survey. Results were compared with a parallel GP trainee survey. A total of 448/714 (62.7%) GPs responded. Approximately one-third of GPs were based in urban, rural, and mixed areas. Over 75% of GPs who responded had patients who used illicit opiates, and 25% prescribed methadone. Two-thirds of GPs were in favour of increased naloxone availability in the community; almost one-third would take part in such a scheme. A higher proportion of GP trainees had used naloxone to treat opiate overdose than qualified GPs. In addition, a higher proportion of GP trainees were willing to be involved in naloxone distribution than qualified GPs. Intranasal naloxone was much preferred to single (P<0.001) or multiple dose (P<0.001) intramuscular naloxone. Few GPs objected to wider naloxone availability, with 66.1% (n = 292) being in favour. GPs report extensive contact with people who have opiate use disorders but provide limited opiate agonist treatment. They support wider availability of naloxone and would participate in its expansion. Development and evaluation of an implementation strategy to support GP-based distribution is urgently needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 25 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Unspecified 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 24 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,863,315
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,309
of 4,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,954
of 312,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#28
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.