| Title |
Strategy for Texture Management in Metals Additive Manufacturing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JOM, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11837-017-2264-3 |
| Authors |
M. M. Kirka, Y. Lee, D. A. Greeley, A. Okello, M. J. Goin, M. T. Pearce, R. R. Dehoff |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 25% |
| Researcher | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 54 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 59 | 29% |
| Materials Science | 59 | 29% |
| Energy | 2 | <1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 74 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,243,797
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#20
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,931
of 425,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#1
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.