↓ Skip to main content

Effect of the flexibility training performed immediately before resistance training on muscle hypertrophy, maximum strength and flexibility

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 4,345)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
251 X users
facebook
38 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
21 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
Title
Effect of the flexibility training performed immediately before resistance training on muscle hypertrophy, maximum strength and flexibility
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00421-016-3527-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Moriggi Junior, Ricardo Berton, Thiago Mattos Frota de Souza, Mara Patrícia Traina Chacon-Mikahil, Cláudia Regina Cavaglieri

Abstract

It has been suggested that flexibility training may reduce the total volume of training during resistance trainings. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of flexibility training immediately before resistance training (FLEX-RT) versus resistance training without flexibility training (RT) on maximum strength and the vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area (CSA). Participants had each leg assigned to RT or FLEX-RT. Both groups performed four sets of leg extensions to voluntary failure of 80% of one repetition maximum (1RM); however, FLEX-RT performed two sets of 25 s of static stretching before resistance training. Number of repetitions and total volume were calculated during weeks 1-5 and 6-10. Vastus lateralis muscle CSA, 1RM, and flexibility were assessed at baseline and after 10 weeks. The number of repetitions and total training volume were greater for RT than FLEX-RT for weeks 1-5 and 6-10. Regarding the vastus lateralis muscle CSA, a main time effect was observed, however, greater change was observed for RT than FLEX-RT (12.7 and 7.4%, respectively). A main time effect for 1RM was also observed with similar changes for RT and FLEX-RT (12.7 and 12.9%, respectively). Flexibility was increased pre- to post-training for FLEX-RT with greater change for FLEX-RT (10.1%) than RT (2.1%). These results show that performing flexibility training immediately before resistance training can contribute to a lower number of repetitions, total volume, and muscle hypertrophy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 251 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 253 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 61 24%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Researcher 13 5%
Other 12 5%
Other 51 20%
Unknown 60 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 94 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 73 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 227. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#168,262
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#37
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,705
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.