| Title |
Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of antipsychotic medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00127-013-0753-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph H. Puyat, Jamie R. Daw, Colleen M. Cunningham, Michael R. Law, Sabrina T. Wong, Devon L. Greyson, Steven G. Morgan |
| Abstract |
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published evidence on ethnic or racial disparities in the outpatient use versus non-use of antipsychotics and in the outpatient use of newer versus older antipsychotics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 16% |
| Psychology | 12 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,107,367
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#598
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,799
of 198,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.