| Title |
Protecting imperiled “paper parks”: potential lessons from the Sierra Chinajá, Guatemala
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-008-9368-6 |
| Authors |
Curan A. Bonham, Eduardo Sacayon, Ernesto Tzi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 100% |
| Italy | 1 | 100% |
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
| Mexico | 1 | 100% |
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 3200% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 2800% |
| Researcher | 27 | 2700% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 900% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 700% |
| Other | 19 | 1900% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 49 | 4900% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 3800% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 1000% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 600% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 200% |
| Other | 10 | 1000% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#925,878
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#108
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,851
of 83,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.