↓ Skip to main content

Sustainable farming practices of the Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) around Hongze Lake, lower Yangtze River Basin, China

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Sustainable farming practices of the Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) around Hongze Lake, lower Yangtze River Basin, China
Published in
Ambio, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13280-015-0722-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qidong Wang, Jiashou Liu, Shengyu Zhang, Yuxi Lian, Huaiyu Ding, Xue Du, Zhongjie Li, Sena S. De Silva

Abstract

Results of a survey of 156 Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) grow-out farms around Hongze Lake (118.48-118.72°E; 33.36-33.38°N) are reported. Area farmed has remained relatively unchanged but production (59 932 t in 2012) increased steadily over the last 7 years, indicative of the viability and sustainability of the farming system that has gradually replaced intensive Chinese major carp polyculture around Hongze Lake. Results showed that production range was 135-2400 kg ha(-1) cycle(-1) (mean 1144 ± 34). Crab yields correlated linearly to stocking density and conformed to a normal distribution curve, with 66.7 % of farms yielding 900 kg ha(-1) cycle(-1) or more. Yield was negatively correlated to pond size and capture size (p < 0.01), and farms with macrophyte coverage rate lower than 30 % of water surface were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than those exceeding 30 %.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 29%
Environmental Science 6 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,547,176
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,012
of 1,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,761
of 285,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.