| Title |
Arbuscular mycorrhizal networks: process and functions. A review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1051/agro/2009054 |
| Authors |
Neera Garg, Shikha Chandel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| New Caledonia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 15% |
| Researcher | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 24% |
| Unknown | 35 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 44 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,522,616
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#562
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,106
of 94,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.