You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stable isotope analysis as an early monitoring tool for community‐scale effects of rat eradication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Restoration Ecology, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/rec.12511 |
| Authors |
Katherine M. Nigro, Stacie A. Hathaway, Alex S. Wegmann, Ana Miller‐ter Kuile, Robert N. Fisher, Hillary S. Young |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| New Caledonia | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,812,257
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from Restoration Ecology
#406
of 1,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,737
of 324,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Restoration Ecology
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.