↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Electromagnetic Stirrer Agitated Liquid Metal Flows by Dynamic Neutron Radiography

Overview of attention for article published in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of Electromagnetic Stirrer Agitated Liquid Metal Flows by Dynamic Neutron Radiography
Published in
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11663-016-0902-8
Authors

Mihails Ščepanskis, Mārtiņš Sarma, Peter Vontobel, Pavel Trtik, Knud Thomsen, Andris Jakovičs, Toms Beinerts

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 41%
Physics and Astronomy 3 18%
Materials Science 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2017.
All research outputs
#18,536,772
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
#627
of 659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,161
of 422,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 659 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.