↓ Skip to main content

Managing the apparent and hidden difficulties of weaning from mechanical ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
Title
Managing the apparent and hidden difficulties of weaning from mechanical ventilation
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00134-013-3014-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Perren, Laurent Brochard

Abstract

In anaesthetized patients scheduled for surgery, tracheal intubation is performed with the expectation of subsequent smooth extubation. In critically ill patients, separation from the ventilator is often gradual and the time chosen for extubation may be either delayed or premature. Thus, weaning is challenging, represents a large part of the ventilation period and concerns all mechanically ventilated patients surviving their stay.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
Colombia 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 260 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 15%
Other 32 12%
Student > Postgraduate 28 10%
Student > Master 28 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Other 74 27%
Unknown 47 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 158 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Unspecified 5 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 59 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,759,657
of 23,685,936 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,405
of 5,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,573
of 198,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,685,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.