↓ Skip to main content

Habitat requirements of endangered species in a former coppice of high conservation value

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Geobotanica, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Habitat requirements of endangered species in a former coppice of high conservation value
Published in
Folia Geobotanica, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12224-016-9276-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Roleček, Ondřej Vild, Jiří Sladký, Radomír Řepka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 33%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 41%
Environmental Science 7 26%
Unspecified 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#18,536,772
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Folia Geobotanica
#167
of 243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,558
of 310,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Geobotanica
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.