↓ Skip to main content

Cadmium-zinc-telluride myocardial perfusion imaging: The dream of a single test gets nearer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Cadmium-zinc-telluride myocardial perfusion imaging: The dream of a single test gets nearer
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12350-017-0833-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Nudi, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 50%
Other 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 63%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2017.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#1,303
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,122
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#16
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.