↓ Skip to main content

3D-printed porous titanium changed femoral head repair growth patterns: osteogenesis and vascularisation in porous titanium

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
3D-printed porous titanium changed femoral head repair growth patterns: osteogenesis and vascularisation in porous titanium
Published in
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10856-017-5862-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Zhu, Yan Zhao, Qi Ma, Yingjie Wang, Zhihong Wu, Xisheng Weng

Abstract

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a major cause of morbidity, and total hip arthroplasty is both traumatic and expensive. Here, we created a gelatine scaffold embedded in uniquely shaped, 3D-printed porous titanium parts, which could attract and promote the proliferation of osteoblasts as well as bone regeneration, as the extracellular matrix (ECM) does in vivo. Interestingly, after hybridisation with platelets, the scaffold exhibited a low yet considerable rate of stable, safe and long-term growth factor release. Additionally, a novel ONFH model was constructed and verified. Scaffolds implanted in this model were found to accelerate bone repair. In conclusion, our scaffold successfully simulates the ECM and considerably accelerates bone regeneration, in which platelets play an indispensable role. We believe that platelets should be emphasised as carriers that may be employed to transport drugs, cytokines and other small molecules to target locations in vivo. In addition, this novel scaffold is a useful material for treating ONFH. An overview of the novel scaffold mimicking the extracellular environment in bone repair. a and b: A gelatine scaffold was cross-linked and freeze-dried within 3D-printed porous titanium. c: Platelets were coated onto the gelatine microscaffold after freeze-drying platelet-rich plasma. d: The microscaffold supported the migration of cells into the titanium pores and their subsequent growth, while the platelets slowly released cell factors, exerting bioactivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 32%
Engineering 8 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2017.
All research outputs
#19,172,733
of 24,411,829 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#1,204
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,781
of 315,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,411,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.