↓ Skip to main content

Overall Gambling Behaviors and Gambling Treatment Needs Among a Statewide Sample of Drug Treatment Clients in Ohio

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Overall Gambling Behaviors and Gambling Treatment Needs Among a Statewide Sample of Drug Treatment Clients in Ohio
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10899-013-9406-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Thomas Sherba, Nicholas J. Martt

Abstract

Casino gambling in Ohio became available for the first time in May 2012. This gambling expansion led the Ohio substance abuse monitoring (OSAM) Network, Ohio's drug abuse surveillance system that collects drug trend data on an ongoing basis, to amend its protocol in June 2011 to include collection of data related to problem and pathological gambling to inform current treatment and prevention needs. OSAM collected gambling data from July 2011 to June 2012 via focus group interviews of 714 drug users recruited from alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment programs throughout Ohio. Participants who reported gambling during the past 6 months (N = 412) completed the South Oaks gambling screen. This study found a prevalence estimate of 12.1 % for probable pathological gambling among its statewide sample. Sizeable proportions of participants reported that they gambled more when using AOD (23.5 %) and used more AOD when gambling (19.4 %). A majority of study participants (59.2 %) reported participation in at least one type of gambling during the past 6 months, and of those participants, only 22.2 % reported ever having been asked about gambling while receiving AOD treatment services, with just 12.5 % reporting ever having had gambling treatment services offered to them. Men were 4.1 times more likely to screen positive for probable pathological gambling than women; non-Whites were 61.0 % more likely to screen positive than Whites. Findings presented in this report have the potential to help shape and strengthen problem and pathological gambling prevention and treatment measures in Ohio.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Social Sciences 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 14 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#337
of 989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,122
of 209,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.