↓ Skip to main content

Corruption and Companies: The Use of Facilitating Payments

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Corruption and Companies: The Use of Facilitating Payments
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, September 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10551-005-0133-4
Authors

Antonio Argandoña

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 101 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 30 29%
Social Sciences 20 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 28 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,522,616
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,187
of 2,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,567
of 58,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.