↓ Skip to main content

Shark fishing in fin soup

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, March 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Shark fishing in fin soup
Published in
Conservation Genetics, March 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1011590517389
Authors

A.R. Hoelzel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 4 2%
United States 3 2%
Colombia 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Uruguay 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
India 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 148 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 21%
Student > Bachelor 35 21%
Researcher 34 20%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 5 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 69%
Environmental Science 21 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 9 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#505
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,266
of 42,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them