↓ Skip to main content

Social inequities along the cervical cancer continuum: a structured review

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Social inequities along the cervical cancer continuum: a structured review
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, February 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10552-004-1290-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara J. Newmann, Elizabeth O. Garner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Unknown 101 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 36%
Social Sciences 16 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 19 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#950
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,790
of 145,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.