↓ Skip to main content

Predicting Intentional Communication in Preverbal Preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Predicting Intentional Communication in Preverbal Preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3052-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Micheal Sandbank, Tiffany Woynaroski, Linda R. Watson, Elizabeth Gardner, Bahar Keçeli Kaysili, Paul Yoder

Abstract

Intentional communication has previously been identified as a value-added predictor of expressive language in preverbal preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. In the present study, we sought to identify value-added predictors of intentional communication. Of five theoretically-motivated putative predictors of intentional communication measured early in the study (at study entry and 4 months after), three had significant zero-order correlations with later intentional communication (12 months after study entry) and were thus added to a linear model that predicted later intentional communication scores controlling for initial intentional communication scores at study entry. After controlling for initial intentional communication, early motor imitation was the only predictor that accounted for a significant amount of variance in children's later intentional communication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 32%
Social Sciences 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Linguistics 6 5%
Arts and Humanities 5 4%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 43 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,997,374
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#879
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,465
of 313,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#18
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.