↓ Skip to main content

Current cases in which epitope mimicry is considered as a component cause of autoimmune disease: immune-mediated (type 1) diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Current cases in which epitope mimicry is considered as a component cause of autoimmune disease: immune-mediated (type 1) diabetes
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, April 2000
DOI 10.1007/pl00000715
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Kukreja, N. K. Maclaren*

Abstract

Autoimmune diseases result from a combination of genetic, immunologic, hormonal, and environmental factors. Infectious agents may induce the breakdown of immunological tolerance and the appearance of autoreactivity. However, the specific relationship between infection and autoimmunity is still unclear. One of the mechanisms responsible could be molecular mimicry between the infectious agent and self. The concept of molecular mimicry is a viable hypothesis in the investigation of the etiology, pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of autoimmune disorders. Immune-mediated (type 1) diabetes in humans and in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice is polygenic and characterized by autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic beta cells in islets of Langerhans. In NOD mice, a T-helper 1 (Th1)-based autoimmune response arises spontaneously against glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) concurrently with the onset of insulitis. Subsequently. this Th1-type autoreactivity spreads intra- and intermolecularly to other beta cell autoantigens, suggesting that a Th1-type response is responsible for the progression of the disease, whereas Th2 responses when experimentally induced are protective. In humans, a homology between GAD and the P2-C protein of Coxsackie B make a cause-and-effect molecular mimicry an attractive hypothesis. Evidence to support the concept of molecular mimicry in diabetes is reviewed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 18%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%