↓ Skip to main content

The relative timing of VMO and VL in the aetiology of anterior knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
Title
The relative timing of VMO and VL in the aetiology of anterior knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-9-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Chester, Toby O Smith, David Sweeting, John Dixon, Sarah Wood, Fujian Song

Abstract

Anterior knee pain (AKP) is a common musculoskeletal complaint. It has been suggested that one factor that may contribute to the presence of AKP is a delay in the recruitment of the vastus medialis oblique muscle (VMO) relative to the vastus lateralis muscle (VL). There is however little consensus within the literature regarding the existence or nature of any such delay in the recruitment of the VMO within the AKP population. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the relative timing of onset of the VMO and VL in those with AKP in comparison to the asymptomatic population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 231 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 16%
Student > Bachelor 33 14%
Student > Postgraduate 22 9%
Other 15 6%
Other 50 20%
Unknown 39 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 16%
Sports and Recreations 31 13%
Engineering 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 49 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,276,424
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,444
of 4,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,021
of 79,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.