↓ Skip to main content

Teplizumab Preserves C-Peptide in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Two-Year Results From the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Protégé Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Teplizumab Preserves C-Peptide in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Two-Year Results From the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Protégé Trial
Published in
Diabetes, October 2013
DOI 10.2337/db13-0236
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Hagopian, Robert J. Ferry, Nicole Sherry, David Carlin, Ezio Bonvini, Syd Johnson, Kathryn E. Stein, Scott Koenig, Anastasia G. Daifotis, Kevan C. Herold, Johnny Ludvigsson

Abstract

Protégé was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled 2-year study of three intravenous teplizumab dosing regimens, administered daily for 14 days at baseline and again after 26 weeks, in new-onset type 1 diabetes. We sought to determine efficacy and safety of teplizumab immunotherapy at 2 years and to identify characteristics associated with therapeutic response. Of 516 randomized patients, 513 were treated, and 462 completed 2 years of follow-up. Teplizumab (14-day full-dose) reduced the loss of C-peptide mean area under the curve (AUC), a prespecified secondary end point, at 2 years versus placebo. In analyses of prespecified and post hoc subsets at entry, U.S. residents, patients with C-peptide mean AUC >0.2 nmol/L, those randomized ≤6 weeks after diagnosis, HbA1c <7.5% (58 mmol/mol), insulin use <0.4 units/kg/day, and 8-17 years of age each had greater teplizumab-associated C-peptide preservation than their counterparts. Exogenous insulin needs tended to be reduced versus placebo. Antidrug antibodies developed in some patients, without apparent change in drug efficacy. No new safety or tolerability issues were observed during year 2. In summary, anti-CD3 therapy reduced C-peptide loss 2 years after diagnosis using a tolerable dose.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 134 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Master 11 8%
Other 5 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 53 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 48 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,892,120
of 24,565,648 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes
#799
of 9,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,423
of 217,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes
#9
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,565,648 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.