↓ Skip to main content

Development of diagnostic and treatment strategies for glaucoma through understanding and modification of scleral and lamina cribrosa connective tissue

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Development of diagnostic and treatment strategies for glaucoma through understanding and modification of scleral and lamina cribrosa connective tissue
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00441-013-1603-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harry A. Quigley, Frances E. Cone

Abstract

Considerable evidence indicates that the state of ocular connective tissues and their response in glaucomatous disease affect the degree of glaucoma damage. Both experimental and clinical data suggest that improved diagnostic and prognostic information can be derived from the assessment of the mechanical responsiveness of the sclera and lamina cribrosa to intraocular pressure (IOP). Controlled mutagenesis of the sclera has produced a mouse strain that is relatively resistant to increased IOP. Alteration of the baseline scleral state can be accomplished through either increased cross-linking of fibrillar components or their reduction. The sclera is a dynamic structure, altering its structure and behavior in response to IOP change. The biochemical pathways that control these responses are fertile areas for new glaucoma treatments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Other 8 15%
Researcher 8 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 35%
Engineering 10 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2013.
All research outputs
#16,061,913
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#1,468
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,477
of 199,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#17
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.