↓ Skip to main content

Clostridium difficile exposure as an insidious source of infection in healthcare settings: an epidemiological model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clostridium difficile exposure as an insidious source of infection in healthcare settings: an epidemiological model
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-376
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laith Yakob, Thomas V Riley, David L Paterson, Archie CA Clements

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of infectious diarrhea in hospitalized patients. Its epidemiology has shifted in recent years from almost exclusively infecting elderly patients in whom the gut microbiota has been disturbed by antimicrobials, to now also infecting individuals of all age groups with no recent antimicrobial use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 89 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 9 10%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 16%
Mathematics 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2013.
All research outputs
#13,374,110
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,074
of 7,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,204
of 177,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#47
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.