↓ Skip to main content

Young people’s experience of individual cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) in an inpatient eating disorder service: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Young people’s experience of individual cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) in an inpatient eating disorder service: a qualitative study
Published in
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40519-017-0369-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucia Giombini, Sophie Nesbitt, Lauren Waples, Emilia Finazzi, Abigail Easter, Kate Tchanturia

Abstract

Current literature shows promising results regarding the efficacy of Cognitive Remediation Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa (AN); however, there is a paucity of studies considering the use of CRT in Young People (YP). The aim of this study was to examine YP's experiences of individual CRT in an inpatient eating disorder unit. Seventy letters following a cycle of eight individual CRT sessions were analysed using thematic analysis, adopting an inductive approach. Inter-rater reliability of findings was ensured. The following six higher-order themes, each with lower-order themes, were identified: engaging aspects of CRT; identifying thinking skills; relevance to real-life situations; encountering personal challenges; making sense of the rational of CRT; suggestions for further improvements. YP reported enjoying CRT and described increased learning about their thinking styles and their skills from the activities undertaken during therapy. Some participants were able to apply learning outside of therapy and less frequently to difficulties related to the illness. Feedback from patients suggests CRT is a useful intervention for YP with AN, which could facilitate their engagement in the treatment, while tackling neuropsychological processes underlying psychological symptoms of AN. Exploring participants' experience of CRT has highlighted specific elements of the intervention perceived as beneficial by YP, and areas where adaption could be made. This will allow clinicians to further develop the intervention from a service users' perspective, tailoring the sessions to their needs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 21 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 25 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2017.
All research outputs
#16,291,311
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
#655
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,297
of 315,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.