↓ Skip to main content

A Formally Verified Proof of the Central Limit Theorem

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Automated Reasoning, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 161)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
A Formally Verified Proof of the Central Limit Theorem
Published in
Journal of Automated Reasoning, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10817-017-9404-x
Authors

Jeremy Avigad, Johannes Hölzl, Luke Serafin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Luxembourg 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 26%
Mathematics 3 16%
Engineering 2 11%
Psychology 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,384,917
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Automated Reasoning
#2
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,032
of 426,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Automated Reasoning
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them