↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of bidirectional sex change and gonochorism in fishes of the gobiid genera Trimma, Priolepis, and Trimmatom

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of bidirectional sex change and gonochorism in fishes of the gobiid genera Trimma, Priolepis, and Trimmatom
Published in
The Science of Nature, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00114-017-1434-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomoki Sunobe, Tetsuya Sado, Kiyoshi Hagiwara, Hisaya Manabe, Toshiyuki Suzuki, Yasuhisa Kobayashi, Makoto Sakurai, Shin-ichi Dewa, Midori Matsuoka, Akihiko Shinomiya, Kazuya Fukuda, Masaki Miya

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 32%
Other 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 32%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,271,471
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#735
of 2,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,897
of 324,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.