↓ Skip to main content

Bechstein’s bats maintain individual social links despite a complete reorganisation of their colony structure

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Bechstein’s bats maintain individual social links despite a complete reorganisation of their colony structure
Published in
The Science of Nature, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00114-013-1090-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Baigger, N. Perony, M. Reuter, V. Leinert, M. Melber, S. Grünberger, D. Fleischmann, G. Kerth

Abstract

Several social mammals, including elephants and some primates, whales and bats, live in multilevel societies that form temporary subgroups. Despite these fission-fusion dynamics, group members often maintain long-term bonds. However, it is unclear whether such individual links and the resulting stable social subunits continue to exist after a complete reorganisation of a society, e.g. following a population crash. Here, we employed a weighted network analysis on 7,109 individual roosting records collected over 4 years in a wild Bechstein's bat colony. We show that, in response to a strong population decline, the colony's two stable social subunits fused into a non-modular social network. Nevertheless, in the first year after the crash, long-term bonds were still detectable, suggesting that the bats remembered previous individual relationships. Our findings are important for understanding the flexibility of animal societies in the face of dramatic changes and for the conservation of social mammals with declining populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
Switzerland 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
India 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 53%
Environmental Science 11 14%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Psychology 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,511,179
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#333
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,737
of 177,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.