| Title |
Recovery Principles and Evidence-Based Practice: Essential Ingredients of Service Improvement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Community Mental Health Journal, February 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10597-005-2608-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William C. Torrey, Charles A. Rapp, Laura Van Tosh, Charity R. A. McNabb, Ruth O. Ralph |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 27% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,522,616
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#387
of 1,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,750
of 141,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them