You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical benefits and economic impact of post-surgical care provided by pharmacists in a Canadian hospital
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ijpp.12058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heather L Neville, Bernadette Chevalier, Chris Daley, Lisa Nodwell, Claudia Harding, Anne Hiltz, Tammy MacDonald, Chris Skedgel, Neil J MacKinnon, Kathryn Slayter |
| Abstract |
Clinical pharmacists improve the quality of patient care by reducing adverse drug events (ADEs), length of stay and mortality. This impact is currently not well described in surgery. The objective was to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes after clinical pharmacist services were added to two general surgical wards in an adult hospital. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 26% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 26% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#13,842,768
of 23,460,553 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
#417
of 666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,469
of 200,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,460,553 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.