↓ Skip to main content

Recent Economic Evaluations of Interventions to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease by Reducing Sodium Intake

Overview of attention for article published in Current Atherosclerosis Reports, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Recent Economic Evaluations of Interventions to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease by Reducing Sodium Intake
Published in
Current Atherosclerosis Reports, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11883-013-0349-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guijing Wang, Barbara A. Bowman

Abstract

Excess intake of sodium, a common problem worldwide, is associated with hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD), and hypertension is a major risk factor for CVD. Population-wide efforts to reduce sodium intake have been identified as a promising strategy for preventing hypertension and CVD, and such initiatives are currently recommended by a variety of scientific and public health organizations. By reviewing the literature published from January 2011 to March 2013, we summarized recent economic analyses of interventions to reduce sodium intake. The evidence, derived from estimates of resultant blood pressure decreases and thus decreases in the incidence of CVD events, supports population-wide interventions for reducing sodium intake. Both lowering the salt content in manufactured foods and conducting mass media campaigns at the national level are estimated to be cost-effective in preventing CVD. Although better data on the cost of interventions are needed for rigorous economic evaluations, population-wide sodium intake reduction can be a promising approach for containing the growing health and economic burden associated with hypertension and its sequelae.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 18%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Decision Sciences 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%