You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical epidemiology of the global expansion of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70190-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L Silvia Munoz-Price, Laurent Poirel, Robert A Bonomo, Mitchell J Schwaber, George L Daikos, Martin Cormican, Giuseppe Cornaglia, Javier Garau, Marek Gniadkowski, Mary K Hayden, Karthikeyan Kumarasamy, David M Livermore, Juan J Maya, Patrice Nordmann, Jean B Patel, David L Paterson, Johann Pitout, Maria Virginia Villegas, Hui Wang, Neil Woodford, John P Quinn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 8 | 20% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 68% |
| Scientists | 7 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1279 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 171 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 165 | 13% |
| Researcher | 154 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 136 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 84 | 6% |
| Other | 239 | 18% |
| Unknown | 355 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 266 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 167 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 167 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 151 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 37 | 3% |
| Other | 101 | 8% |
| Unknown | 415 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#938,783
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#1,301
of 6,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,861
of 215,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#11
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 93.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.