↓ Skip to main content

Variation factors in the design and analysis of replicated controlled experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Software Engineering, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Variation factors in the design and analysis of replicated controlled experiments
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10664-013-9262-z
Authors

Per Runeson, Andreas Stefik, Anneliese Andrews

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Professor 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 58%
Engineering 4 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,571,473
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#163
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,017
of 213,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.