↓ Skip to main content

Is There a Minimum Intensity Threshold for Resistance Training-Induced Hypertrophic Adaptations?

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
71 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
528 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Is There a Minimum Intensity Threshold for Resistance Training-Induced Hypertrophic Adaptations?
Published in
Sports Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40279-013-0088-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brad J. Schoenfeld

Abstract

In humans, regimented resistance training has been shown to promote substantial increases in skeletal muscle mass. With respect to traditional resistance training methods, the prevailing opinion is that an intensity of greater than ~60 % of 1 repetition maximum (RM) is necessary to elicit significant increases in muscular size. It has been surmised that this is the minimum threshold required to activate the complete spectrum of fiber types, particularly those associated with the largest motor units. There is emerging evidence, however, that low-intensity resistance training performed with blood flow restriction (BFR) can promote marked increases in muscle hypertrophy, in many cases equal to that of traditional high-intensity exercise. The anabolic effects of such occlusion-based training have been attributed to increased levels of metabolic stress that mediate hypertrophy at least in part by enhancing recruitment of high-threshold motor units. Recently, several researchers have put forth the theory that low-intensity exercise (≤50 % 1RM) performed without BFR can promote increases in muscle size equal, or perhaps even superior, to that at higher intensities, provided training is carried out to volitional muscular failure. Proponents of the theory postulate that fatiguing contractions at light loads is simply a milder form of BFR and thus ultimately results in maximal muscle fiber recruitment. Current research indicates that low-load exercise can indeed promote increases in muscle growth in untrained subjects, and that these gains may be functionally, metabolically, and/or aesthetically meaningful. However, whether hypertrophic adaptations can equal that achieved with higher intensity resistance exercise (≤60 % 1RM) remains to be determined. Furthermore, it is not clear as to what, if any, hypertrophic effects are seen with low-intensity exercise in well-trained subjects as experimental studies on the topic in this population are lacking. Practical implications of these findings are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 528 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 508 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 106 20%
Student > Master 89 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 10%
Professor 35 7%
Other 30 6%
Other 118 22%
Unknown 98 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 225 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 2%
Other 44 8%
Unknown 120 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#852,939
of 25,076,138 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#772
of 2,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,077
of 205,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,076,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.