↓ Skip to main content

Does regional compared to local anaesthesia influence outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation?

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Does regional compared to local anaesthesia influence outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation?
Published in
Trials, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan James Robert Macfarlane, Rachel Joyce Kearns, Emma Aitken, John Kinsella, Marc James Clancy

Abstract

An arteriovenous fistula is the optimal form of vascular access in patients with end-stage renal failure requiring haemodialysis. Unfortunately, approximately one-third of fistulae fail at an early stage. Different anaesthetic techniques can influence factors associated with fistula success, such as intraoperative blood flow and venous diameter. A regional anaesthetic brachial plexus block results in vasodilatation and improved short- and long-term fistula flow compared to the infiltration of local anaesthetic alone. This, however, has not yet been shown in a large trial to influence long-term fistula patency, the ultimate clinical measure of success.The aim of this study is to compare whether a regional anaesthetic block, compared to local anaesthetic infiltration, can improve long-term fistula patency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 94 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 14%
Other 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 26 27%
Unknown 22 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 28 29%