↓ Skip to main content

Clinical features and prognostic factors of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: a literature review of 105 cases from 1999 to 2011

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Clinical features and prognostic factors of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: a literature review of 105 cases from 1999 to 2011
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10067-013-2312-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Honghao Jiang, Xiangjie An, Ya Li, Yi Sun, Guanxin Shen, Yating Tu, Juan Tao

Abstract

This study aims to review clinical features, treatments, and prognostic factors of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) associated with systemic lupus erythematosus patients (sTTP). The case reports of sTTP published in world literature from 1999 to 2011 were collected, and 105 cases were divided into death group and survival group. The epidemiologic characteristics, clinical manifestations, laboratory examinations, treatments, and prognostic factors were analyzed. We found that coexistence of renal and neurological impairments were significantly frequent in the death group (100%) than in the survival group (56.5%) (P = 0.002). Type IV was predominant in 57.7% of renal pathological damage, followed by type V (11.5%), type II (5.8%), and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) (5.8%). TMA appeared more frequently (50%) in the death group than in the survival group (6.25%) (P = 0.042). End-stage renal disease occurred in nine cases with type IV in five (55.6%), type TMA in one (11.1%), and unspecified in three cases (33.3%). Of 32 cases, 40.6% showed severe ADAMTS13 deficiency and returned to normal or mildly deficient after remission. The total mortality rate of sTTP was 12.4 % and the mortality rate of patients with infection (27.3%) was significantly higher than those without infection (8.4%) (P = 0.028). Plasma exchange and glucocorticoids were administrated in over 80% of cases with 65.7% remission rate, while additional cytotoxics or rituximab was mostly used in refractory sTTP and achieved over 90 % of remission rate. Above all, coexistence of renal and neurological impairments, infection, and renal damage with type IV or TMA might denote a poor prognosis of sTTP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Other 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,276,424
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#1,976
of 2,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,456
of 198,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#23
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.