↓ Skip to main content

Effect of bariatric surgery on oncologic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 6,749)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
38 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
10 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Effect of bariatric surgery on oncologic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00464-013-3127-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

May C. Tee, Yin Cao, Garth L. Warnock, Frank B. Hu, Jorge E. Chavarro

Abstract

Obesity is a major public health issue and is associated with increased risk of several cancers, currently a leading cause of mortality. Obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery may allow for evaluation of the effect of intentional excess weight loss on subsequent risk of cancer. We aimed to evaluate cancer risk, incidence, and mortality after bariatric surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 8 10%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 28 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#498,104
of 25,058,660 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#21
of 6,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,386
of 181,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#2
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,058,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,749 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.