↓ Skip to main content

Smoking and Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
Smoking and Breast Cancer
Published in
Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10911-012-9269-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peggy Reynolds

Abstract

The potential role of smoking in breast cancer risk has been the subject of over 100 publications, numerous scientific reviews, and animated debate. Tobacco exposure is a well-established cause of lung cancer, and is thought to account for nearly one third of all cancer deaths. Tobacco smoke contains thousands of chemicals, many of which are known to be mammary carcinogens. Although not initially thought to be a tobacco-related cancer, over the last several decades evidence has been accumulating on the role of both active smoking and secondhand smoking in the etiology of breast cancer. The human health evidence has been systematically evaluated not only by several independent researchers but also by several expert agency panels including those of the U.S. Surgeon General, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the California Environmental Protection Agency, and a coalition of Canadian health agencies. Although the assessments have varied with time and across reviewers, the most recent weight of the evidence has suggested a potentially casual role for active smoking and breast cancer, particularly for long-term heavy smoking and smoking initiation at an early age. The role of secondhand smoking and breast cancer is less clear, although there has been some suggestion for an increased risk for premenopausal breast cancer. Recent studies evaluating the possible modifying role of polymorphisms in genes involved in the metabolism of tobacco products, particularly NAT2, have contributed another dimension to these assessments, although to date that evidence remains equivocal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 175 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 50 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 9%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 54 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,378,900
of 24,138,997 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia
#123
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,689
of 284,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,138,997 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.