↓ Skip to main content

Biochemical responses and physical performance during high-intensity resistance circuit training in hypoxia and normoxia

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Biochemical responses and physical performance during high-intensity resistance circuit training in hypoxia and normoxia
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00421-017-3571-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Domingo J. Ramos-Campo, Jacobo A. Rubio-Arias, Stéphane Dufour, Linda Chung, Vicente Ávila-Gandía, Pedro E. Alcaraz

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of hypoxia on metabolic and acid-base balance, blood oxygenation, electrolyte, and half-squat performance variables during high-resistance circuit (HRC) training. Twelve resistance-trained subjects participated in this study. After a 6RM testing session, participants performed three randomized trials of HRC: normoxia (NORM: FiO2 = 0.21), moderate hypoxia (MH: FiO2 = 0.16), or high hypoxia (HH: FiO2 = 0.13), separated by 72 h of recovery in normoxic conditions. HRC consisted of two blocks of three exercises (Block 1: bench press, deadlift and elbow flexion; Block 2: half-squat, triceps extension, and ankle extension). Each exercise was performed at 6RM. Rest periods lasted for 35 s between exercises, 3 min between sets, and 5 min between blocks. Peak and mean force and power were determined during half-squat. Metabolic, acid-base balance, blood oxygenation and electrolyte variables, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured following each block. During the first set, peak force and power were significantly lower in HH than MH and NORM; whereas in the second set, mean and peak force and power were significantly lower in HH than NORM. At the end of the HRC training session, blood lactate and RPE in HH were significantly higher than in MH and NORM. SaO2, pH, HCO3(-), and pO2 values were significantly lower in all hypoxic conditions than in NORM. These results indicate that simulated hypoxia during HRC exercise reduce blood oxygenation, pH, and HCO3(-,) and increased blood lactate ultimately decreasing muscular performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Professor 7 4%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 62 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 52 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 63 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,804,086
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,314
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,894
of 323,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#40
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.