↓ Skip to main content

Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
293 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
566 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation
Published in
Nature, August 2013
DOI 10.1038/nature12489
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan E. Johnston, Jacob Gratten, Camillo Berenos, Jill G. Pilkington, Tim H. Clutton-Brock, Josephine M. Pemberton, Jon Slate

Abstract

Sexual selection, through intra-male competition or female choice, is assumed to be a source of strong and sustained directional selection in the wild. In the presence of such strong directional selection, alleles enhancing a particular trait are predicted to become fixed within a population, leading to a decrease in the underlying genetic variation. However, there is often considerable genetic variation underlying sexually selected traits in wild populations, and consequently, this phenomenon has become a long-discussed issue in the field of evolutionary biology. In wild Soay sheep, large horns confer an advantage in strong intra-sexual competition, yet males show an inherited polymorphism for horn type and have substantial genetic variation in their horn size. Here we show that most genetic variation in this trait is maintained by a trade-off between natural and sexual selection at a single gene, relaxin-like receptor 2 (RXFP2). We found that an allele conferring larger horns, Ho(+), is associated with higher reproductive success, whereas a smaller horn allele, Ho(P), confers increased survival, resulting in a net effect of overdominance (that is, heterozygote advantage) for fitness at RXFP2. The nature of this trade-off is simple relative to commonly proposed explanations for the maintenance of sexually selected traits, such as genic capture ('good genes') and sexually antagonistic selection. Our results demonstrate that by identifying the genetic architecture of trait variation, we can determine the principal mechanisms maintaining genetic variation in traits under strong selection and explain apparently counter-evolutionary observations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 566 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 2%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 529 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 131 23%
Researcher 126 22%
Student > Master 68 12%
Student > Bachelor 61 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 6%
Other 101 18%
Unknown 47 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 375 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 10%
Environmental Science 31 5%
Psychology 8 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 <1%
Other 25 4%
Unknown 67 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#424,412
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#20,490
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,051
of 213,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#287
of 968 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 968 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.