↓ Skip to main content

Proteomic differences in amyloid plaques in rapidly progressive and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Proteomic differences in amyloid plaques in rapidly progressive and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00401-017-1691-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleanor Drummond, Shruti Nayak, Arline Faustin, Geoffrey Pires, Richard A. Hickman, Manor Askenazi, Mark Cohen, Tracy Haldiman, Chae Kim, Xiaoxia Han, Yongzhao Shao, Jiri G. Safar, Beatrix Ueberheide, Thomas Wisniewski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 177 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 26%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Master 15 8%
Professor 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 39 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Chemistry 9 5%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 41 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,280,255
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#551
of 2,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,058
of 328,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#21
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.