You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of a KCNQ1 Polymorphism Acting as a Protective Modifier Against Arrhythmic Risk in Long-QT Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circgenetics.113.000023 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabine Duchatelet, Lia Crotti, Rachel A. Peat, Isabelle Denjoy, Hideki Itoh, Myriam Berthet, Seiko Ohno, Véronique Fressart, Maria Cristina Monti, Cristina Crocamo, Matteo Pedrazzini, Federica Dagradi, Alessandro Vicentini, Didier Klug, Paul A. Brink, Althea Goosen, Heikki Swan, Lauri Toivonen, Annukka M. Lahtinen, Kimmo Kontula, Wataru Shimizu, Minoru Horie, Alfred L. George, David-Alexandre Trégouët, Pascale Guicheney, Peter J. Schwartz |
| Abstract |
Long-QT syndrome (LQTS) is characterized by such striking clinical heterogeneity that, even among family members carrying the same mutation, clinical outcome can range between sudden death and no symptoms. We investigated the role of genetic variants as modifiers of risk for cardiac events in patients with LQTS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 24% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,571,272
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#469
of 1,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,811
of 206,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.