↓ Skip to main content

First Isolation of Dengue Virus from the 2010 Epidemic in Nepal

Overview of attention for article published in Tropical Medicine and Health, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
First Isolation of Dengue Virus from the 2010 Epidemic in Nepal
Published in
Tropical Medicine and Health, August 2013
DOI 10.2149/tmh.2012-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Basu D. Pandey, Takeshi Nabeshima, Kishor Pandey, Saroj P. Rajendra, Yogendra Shah, Bal R. Adhikari, Govinda Gupta, Ishan Gautam, Mya M. N. Tun, Reo Uchida, Mahendra Shrestha, Ichiro Kurane, Kouichi Morita

Abstract

Dengue is an emerging disease in Nepal and was first observed as an outbreak in nine lowland districts in 2006. In 2010, however, a large epidemic of dengue occurred with 4,529 suspected and 917 serologically-confirmed cases and five deaths reported in government hospitals in Nepal. The collection of demographic information was performed along with an entomological survey and clinical evaluation of the patients. A total of 280 serum samples were collected from suspected dengue patients. These samples were subjected to routine laboratory investigations and IgM-capture ELISA for dengue serological identification, and 160 acute serum samples were used for virus isolation, RT-PCR, sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. The results showed that affected patients were predominately adults, and that 10% of the cases were classified as dengue haemorrhagic fever/ dengue shock syndrome. The genetic characterization of dengue viruses isolated from patients in four major outbreak areas of Nepal suggests that the DENV-1 strain was responsible for the 2010 epidemic. Entomological studies identified Aedes aegypti in all epidemic areas. All viruses belonged to a monophyletic single clade which is phylogenetically close to Indian viruses. The dengue epidemic started in the lowlands and expanded to the highland areas. To our knowledge, this is the first dengue isolation and genetic characterization reported from Nepal.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 24%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Lecturer 3 4%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 20 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 20 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2016.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Medicine and Health
#117
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,303
of 210,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Medicine and Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them